Tuesday, November 6, 2018

Secondary fundraising - Rights issue (The tale of Keppel KBS USD Reit)

REITs are one of the favorite tools of investors, they give predictable dividends, easy to understand and generally have the nature of democratizing ownership of an otherwise very illiquid asset such as a shopping mall or malls.

Unfortunately REITs also have a strategy to grow its dividend and opportunity sets are limited due to only 10% of capital retained and a 45% gearing cap set by the regulator.

As such, to acquire new assets. A company needs to raise funds either by debt, equity or a mix of both (e.g. perpetuals).

In recent days, there were many destructive deals of the sort
1. OUE Commercial REIT
2. Kep KBS Reit
3. Cromwell Reit (not looking at this deal yet)

OUE Commercial REIT generally dragged its share price all the way down from the mid 60s to just 10 bps above its right issue price. You may also look at the NAV and DPU dilutive damage that the corporate action taken on its price - https://risknreturns.com/2018/09/15/oue-commercial-reit-rights-issue-a-case-study-of-value-destruction/

Kep KBS Reit represented the quickest destruction of value for its early adopters at USD 0.88 per share. Today it trades at USD 0.54. Taking into account its 3.82cents distribution, this represented a lost of 43% for the existing shareholders assuming they do not subscribe for their rights and do not sell it either.

Personally I was interested in USA assets because they are direct proxies to a growing economy and the resurgent economic power. But being very aware of the ground zero nature of rising interest rates. One needs to be very careful on this matter.

I did my calculations, and I do believe a lot of value is starting to emerge.




Pros:
1. Attractive yield at 10.355% compared with fund Nareit 3.32% yield, Manulife reit 7.89%
2. Macro trend of improving USA economy will bode well for assets
3. Semi-protected from aspects of trade war due to locality
Risks:
1. Manager may be impatient to offload other assets (another acquisition worth 10% of AUM is being looked at)
2. Large exposure to rising interest rates (3.47% effective IR. Increase is mitigated by 75% swop floating for fixed. Aggregate leverage relatively low at 33.3%) 
3. Large number of tenants (400+) could make it more challenging to manage. Also Tenant quality may not be too certain (not entirely well known names apart from Occulus)
4. Possible revision to USA Tax policy could result in 30% reduction in dividends received

Conclusion
It would be interesting to be able to get the shares as close to USD 0.50. And this taking into account the worse case scenario of 30% dividend reduction (result of dividend withholding tax) and 5% effective interest rate (additional 5.385m of interest expenses). We would get a DPU of 3.452 cents and this gives about 6.9% on USD0.50. If interest rate remains the same, we would get 7.8% yield even with the 30% dividend reduction

- Not too bad a deal if the max downside is 7% yield while the upside is up till 11.2% yield.
- Margin of safety appears to be pretty thick if we are income investors.
- Likely company is under-priced due to rights issue, size of REIT and lack of understanding by investors.


Certainly private placement (issuance to institutional) or usage of perpetuals (hybrid instruments that receive regular dividends) bodes well for shareholders. It is quicker, cleaner and the discount doesn't kill the share price. Unfortunately it is often not an option for small cap REITs. 




Retail Electric Marketplace

Today, I will cover a topic of interest - Retail Electric Marketplace

With a little promotion to a local bank you can sign up for the new good deals here. - https://www.dbs.com.sg/personal/electricity-marketplace/default.page

Independent comparison: https://compare.openelectricitymarket.sg/#/home

Now down to the numbers and how I derived my findings through a basic data comparison.
The premise is that electricity tariffs are heavily dependent on crude oil prices, the former is charged by SP Group (Government) and the latter is market driven and denominated in USD

1. Downloaded data from the EMA (Energy Market Authority) that dates back till 2014
2. Obtained the prices of crude oil prices (USD) from macrotrends.net
3. Obtained the FX rates from XE.com (USD/SGD)

Doing some derivation, I converted the prices of crude oil prices to SGD and charted the market rates.

From the details, I discovered 3 key findings. Keeping in mind Warren Buffett's saying "Praise by name and criticize by category"

1. Since Jan 2014, the prices of electricity has remain within a band of 30% from peak to bottom. To some extent, I believe that electricity prices are controlled to ensure affordability for the common man.

2. While oil prices fell nearly 60% from peak to through, this did not translate into 60% savings. Was the authority making money here while making less money / subsidizing electricity usage when oil price was in the triple figures?

Unfortunately, without a good understanding of the entire value chain and what is the true costs of production. All these would merely be guesses.

WIIFM. As a Distinguished Toastmaster often said, this is his favorite channel - What is in it for me?

3. Applicable knowledge. Asking the right questions may get you the right answers. In this case, the most important question is the liberalization of the open electricity marketplace offering good value for consumers?

The answer is Yes.

Just taking Keppel as the key player.
- Fixed rate for 36 months is 0.1798 cents/KWH (incl GST). This is a 30% discount to the current market rate!

- If you like a bit more speculative flavor, you may consider Pacificlight or Sembcorp/Keppel which offers 21% and 20.5% off the regulated tariffs. (This effectively means you can benefit if the regulated prices fall)

Conclusion:
In my limited knowledge of the world, I understand that 2016 oil prices is a real abnormal situation. With oil barrel prices falling to as low as 50.62 SGD equivalent and electricity tariffs not even breaking 18 cents/KWH, I heavily doubt that the regulated prices would ever break that point. As such you are better off taking a fixed plan instead of sticking with SP Group.

What about flexi-plan? I estimated the breakeven point would need to be - regulated price at 0.22475 for a 20% discount to be 0.1798. How possible is this? Given the strong economy at the moment and rising oil prices, quite unlikely. But never say never.

Better to switch to to a private operator (fixed gets my vote at the moment).


Table 1: Historical data with estimates

Crude oil prices in SGD (left) | Electricity charged by SP Group (Right)

Aggregated chart